My sense if humor isn't what you would called sophisticated to say the least. A lot of people get bent out of shape when people start making jokes because you're always at risk of offending someone. This translates into news and how it should be presented. Some stories are funny, should they be aired just because they aren't always the most important or informative, yes they should. A fine example is a story that broke globally of phallic shaped fish being blown about by a recent storm on a California beach.
Instagram Post
These fat innkeeper worms (called this because other animals tend to live in the burrows they make), also know as "penis fish", generally live under the sand and aren't seen by many beach goers. The recent storm brought massive waves that washed away many layers of sand, thus revealing the strange creatures. Of course the internet had a good laugh at what seemed to be a beach covered in inappropriately shaped animals. Many jokes ensued, one person even dubbed the beach a total "sausage fest"
Global News Video
Obviously to someone with the mind of a middle school student these animals are quite comical. The question is, does news like this still need to be reported. I feel like there needs to be an odd story tossed in every once in a while just to keep things shaken up. I'm not a fan of serious news stories they tend to be depressing and only be centered around injury or strife. Politics, forget them. Give me a story about penis fish any day. At least I can get a proper chuckle out of the jokes being slung. "Does size really matter?". "Give them a break it was cold outside.". Lastly I would just like to address that another type of "penis fish" is a delicacy in Korea. Yes, they eat them. I'm pretty adventurous culinary wise but I believe I would have to pass on this one.
Original Story
MM 4123 - Jonah Rathburn
Saturday, December 14, 2019
Thursday, November 14, 2019
Depictions of Minorities- A Journey From Novelties to Stars
When we think of American cinema we would do well to think of it as global cinema since the movies the United States produces are by far the most popular. Taking a look at how we got here it is apparent that it takes all kinds of people to make versatile and successful films. But the dark history of American film is still worth learning so as to know what underappreciated minorities felt like trying to land roles in the past. In fact one of the most revolutionary moments in film history is overshadowed by the tasteless writing of the film.
While regarded as the first "talkie" it is clear to see why The Jazz Singer was problematic. While it was a technological feat of the time to have audio synced to a film this movies concept was created on the basis that Al Jolson's character thought he needed to wear blackface to sing jazz in clubs. If you think this is bad let's go back a little further. Birth of a Nation. If you're a film buff you probably know about this one already. Released in 1915 this racist propaganda featured white actors painted to look like African Americans terrorizing white people until the "heroes" (the Ku Klux Klan) save the day by denying them the right to vote and meeting them with violence. This movie was absolutely disgusting but proved effective in sparking violence against African Americans.
In early film African Americans were essentially used as props and things to make jokes out of. They were only put into the movies for novelty. Hattie Mcdaniel, popularly known as "Mammy" from Gone with the Wind (1940) was the first African American to win an Oscar. She realized that many of her roles were meant to exploit her (such as playing a maid or slave character 74 times) but she felt it was important to all African Americans that she used her career as a stepping stone for others. She was a very down to Earth women and was quoted as saying that she would rather make more money playing a maid than being one. She was a pioneer who suffered through degrading roles so modern actors of all races could have their shot, she was something of an icon.
20 years later things got better but not by a ton. Looking at a popular movie from the time called Breakfast at Tiffany's we still see white actors dressing as other races, not cool to say the least. Mickey Rooney's character Mr. Yunoshi was essentially a racist caricature of an Asian man which was part of an Oscar winning film. Yes, they won multiple awards despite this. This was the tip of the iceberg during this time, western movies often portrayed Native Americans and Asians in horribly offensive lights. These role had a lasting cultural impact on Asian actors that is just now being shaken off today with popular films featuring predominately Asian casts such as Crazy Rich Asians. Which, by the way, is a fairly exceptional film which shows part of the rich Asian/Asian American culture. It does a nice job of showcasing high quality Asian actors. And I also can't help but shout out one of my favorite actors of Asian descent, Daniel Dae Kim (this is the part where I plug Hawaii Five-O
Now let's move on to the invention of Blaxploitation films. Around the 70's a new genre began to emerge that played to African American stereotypes. These movies were usually hard hitting action movies with outrageously stereotypical themes. Over the top is the best phrase I can use to describe these films. While some of these movies were wildly offensive, others landed black actors in leading roles in new genres. One movie that I believe is still watchable and enjoyable by today's standards is Shaft. While they do have some clear issues I feel like Shaft was one of the first black action heroes, Richard Roundtree was the man before Samuel L. Jackson and Denzel Washington. I think it's fitting that Jackson carried on the Shaft legacy years later in recent films. In the last 20 years the blaxploitation genre has taken a turn. It now produces fantastic comedy/action hybrid films such as Superfly, Shaft (2019, I highly recommend this sequel if you like gratuitous action and one liners), and BlacKkKlansman. In some ways back in the day blaxploitation films allowed African Americans to take their power back and used some of the stereotypes that some people used to keep them down in Hollywood to make highly successful films.
Let's talk about legends. Men like Richard Pryor, Eddie Murphy, Denzel Washington, Lawrence Fishburne, Samuel L. Jackson, Morgan Freeman, and James Earl Jones. I grew up watching all of these men's films from Beverly Hills Cop to Man on Fire. In fact one of my favorite movies is Denzel Washington's The Equalizer. These men have never been locked into roles based on their race. They were all versatile actors who did not settle for niche stereotypical roles. The only time they leaned into it these stereotypes is when they felt like it, no one would force them to do something they didn't want to do. As someone of Caucasian/Native American descent these men still inspired me. They transcended race and became absolute Hollywood powerhouses. I used to pretend to be Mace Windu with my little plastic purple light saber, tell me that isn't a major impact.
Top 50 Black Actors of All Time
Modern times are looking great for minorities in film. From legendary African American historical films such as 12 Years a Slave, 42, and The Butler, to new age movies like Moonlight. Many roles are open to any race these days as long as the actor fits the part. Actresses like the absolutely gorgeous Zazie Beetz being cast as Domino in Deadpool 2, recent news of Zoe Kravitz being cast as Catwoman for Matt Reeves Batman, or Jeffery Wright as James Gordon in the same upcoming film. One big break is the casting of the new Little Mermaid, her name is Halle Bailey and she is an up and coming African American actor. Movies like Black Panther and Get Out have been wildly popular and have launched a new wave of minorities pulling up their seats at the Hollywood table and personally I love it. It takes all kinds to make films. The future looks bright especially in the superhero genre in addition to the two characters mentioned earlier we have many upcoming films with actors of many ethnic backgrounds such as the varied cast of The Eternals, Blade, and Shang-Chi.
I couldn't end this post without mentioning Tyler Perry. Tyler Perry has been making African American led films for decades. His famous character Madea has graced the screens of family's of all races globally. As a film critic I can't deny the contributions he's had to furthering the roles of minorities in films. He presented stories that gave a look into the lives of African Americans for those who grew up differently.
Think about it like this, someone watching a movie about a predominantly African american experience like the events in Boyz N The Hood who grew up in a wealthy all white neighborhood might view it differently than someone like me who spent years in a low income crime ridden part of a seedy city. It's easier for some people of other races to identify with these movies but they do a good job of giving insight into the worlds of others. Overall I think films have helped people come closer together as humans. They give us unique insight into situations we couldn't possibly understand otherwise.
While regarded as the first "talkie" it is clear to see why The Jazz Singer was problematic. While it was a technological feat of the time to have audio synced to a film this movies concept was created on the basis that Al Jolson's character thought he needed to wear blackface to sing jazz in clubs. If you think this is bad let's go back a little further. Birth of a Nation. If you're a film buff you probably know about this one already. Released in 1915 this racist propaganda featured white actors painted to look like African Americans terrorizing white people until the "heroes" (the Ku Klux Klan) save the day by denying them the right to vote and meeting them with violence. This movie was absolutely disgusting but proved effective in sparking violence against African Americans.
In early film African Americans were essentially used as props and things to make jokes out of. They were only put into the movies for novelty. Hattie Mcdaniel, popularly known as "Mammy" from Gone with the Wind (1940) was the first African American to win an Oscar. She realized that many of her roles were meant to exploit her (such as playing a maid or slave character 74 times) but she felt it was important to all African Americans that she used her career as a stepping stone for others. She was a very down to Earth women and was quoted as saying that she would rather make more money playing a maid than being one. She was a pioneer who suffered through degrading roles so modern actors of all races could have their shot, she was something of an icon.
20 years later things got better but not by a ton. Looking at a popular movie from the time called Breakfast at Tiffany's we still see white actors dressing as other races, not cool to say the least. Mickey Rooney's character Mr. Yunoshi was essentially a racist caricature of an Asian man which was part of an Oscar winning film. Yes, they won multiple awards despite this. This was the tip of the iceberg during this time, western movies often portrayed Native Americans and Asians in horribly offensive lights. These role had a lasting cultural impact on Asian actors that is just now being shaken off today with popular films featuring predominately Asian casts such as Crazy Rich Asians. Which, by the way, is a fairly exceptional film which shows part of the rich Asian/Asian American culture. It does a nice job of showcasing high quality Asian actors. And I also can't help but shout out one of my favorite actors of Asian descent, Daniel Dae Kim (this is the part where I plug Hawaii Five-O
Now let's move on to the invention of Blaxploitation films. Around the 70's a new genre began to emerge that played to African American stereotypes. These movies were usually hard hitting action movies with outrageously stereotypical themes. Over the top is the best phrase I can use to describe these films. While some of these movies were wildly offensive, others landed black actors in leading roles in new genres. One movie that I believe is still watchable and enjoyable by today's standards is Shaft. While they do have some clear issues I feel like Shaft was one of the first black action heroes, Richard Roundtree was the man before Samuel L. Jackson and Denzel Washington. I think it's fitting that Jackson carried on the Shaft legacy years later in recent films. In the last 20 years the blaxploitation genre has taken a turn. It now produces fantastic comedy/action hybrid films such as Superfly, Shaft (2019, I highly recommend this sequel if you like gratuitous action and one liners), and BlacKkKlansman. In some ways back in the day blaxploitation films allowed African Americans to take their power back and used some of the stereotypes that some people used to keep them down in Hollywood to make highly successful films.
Let's talk about legends. Men like Richard Pryor, Eddie Murphy, Denzel Washington, Lawrence Fishburne, Samuel L. Jackson, Morgan Freeman, and James Earl Jones. I grew up watching all of these men's films from Beverly Hills Cop to Man on Fire. In fact one of my favorite movies is Denzel Washington's The Equalizer. These men have never been locked into roles based on their race. They were all versatile actors who did not settle for niche stereotypical roles. The only time they leaned into it these stereotypes is when they felt like it, no one would force them to do something they didn't want to do. As someone of Caucasian/Native American descent these men still inspired me. They transcended race and became absolute Hollywood powerhouses. I used to pretend to be Mace Windu with my little plastic purple light saber, tell me that isn't a major impact.
Top 50 Black Actors of All Time
Modern times are looking great for minorities in film. From legendary African American historical films such as 12 Years a Slave, 42, and The Butler, to new age movies like Moonlight. Many roles are open to any race these days as long as the actor fits the part. Actresses like the absolutely gorgeous Zazie Beetz being cast as Domino in Deadpool 2, recent news of Zoe Kravitz being cast as Catwoman for Matt Reeves Batman, or Jeffery Wright as James Gordon in the same upcoming film. One big break is the casting of the new Little Mermaid, her name is Halle Bailey and she is an up and coming African American actor. Movies like Black Panther and Get Out have been wildly popular and have launched a new wave of minorities pulling up their seats at the Hollywood table and personally I love it. It takes all kinds to make films. The future looks bright especially in the superhero genre in addition to the two characters mentioned earlier we have many upcoming films with actors of many ethnic backgrounds such as the varied cast of The Eternals, Blade, and Shang-Chi.
I couldn't end this post without mentioning Tyler Perry. Tyler Perry has been making African American led films for decades. His famous character Madea has graced the screens of family's of all races globally. As a film critic I can't deny the contributions he's had to furthering the roles of minorities in films. He presented stories that gave a look into the lives of African Americans for those who grew up differently.
Think about it like this, someone watching a movie about a predominantly African american experience like the events in Boyz N The Hood who grew up in a wealthy all white neighborhood might view it differently than someone like me who spent years in a low income crime ridden part of a seedy city. It's easier for some people of other races to identify with these movies but they do a good job of giving insight into the worlds of others. Overall I think films have helped people come closer together as humans. They give us unique insight into situations we couldn't possibly understand otherwise.
Thursday, October 17, 2019
Position Paper #2- Digital Acess in Mymar
Looking at digital access in other countries is often enlightening. For us it's hard to imagine not being connected to some form of internet and all times via a smartphone or other device. The reality of it is that in some places such as Myanmar (formerly known as Burma) have never even used the internet. As strange as that seems, what is even stranger is that some parts of the country have had internet access since 2000. But until 2011 that access was heavily protected by the government who felt it was their place to use software to censor the content their citizens had access to.
Myanmar Internet Access Slider 2000-2011
The slider above shows the percentage of internet users in Myanmar over 11 years. Notice that it barely increases to 1% of the population. But jump to 2015 post censorship ban and a few international telecommunication companies later and 12.6% of the country had access to a reliable albeit slow (to us) 3G internet connection. This was actually much faster than their previous connections which allowed them to stretch their digital legs and explore a new less censored internet. In 2013 more telecommunication laws were established to protect the people's freedom so by this point they were allowed to access troves more information. By 2017 their was an estimated 25.1% of people in the country using some form of internet, much of this increase can be attributed to the use of smartphones.
Internet History In Myanmar

Arguably the most popular use for the internet in Myanmar is Facebook. With 20 Million users in a population of 54 million, needless to say it's popular. This number has jumped up by leaps and bounds over the past few years but hasn't come without a few hiccups. For example, Facebook perpetuated a riot in 2014. For brevity sake i'll sum up the story, a man was accused of rape and because of someone with a large Facebook following and religious differences a riot was incited. The accusation was originally on a blog but blew up when it made it's way onto Facebook. This story shows that no matter where it is some angry misguided person will try to use the internet as their own hate-speech platform. The full story is below:
Facebook Riot Myanmar
Myanmar is obviously subject to the same growing pains numerous other countries have experienced when modernizing their digital access. None the less it has led to new economic growth due to better communication and new markets. The cellphone and internet service market is growing every day. It's just a matter of time before internet access is spread from corner to corner across the entire country. I like to be optimistic and think that with less censorship and restrictions that it will promote knowledge and growth among the population.
The Myanmar Times
Myanmar Internet Access Slider 2000-2011
The slider above shows the percentage of internet users in Myanmar over 11 years. Notice that it barely increases to 1% of the population. But jump to 2015 post censorship ban and a few international telecommunication companies later and 12.6% of the country had access to a reliable albeit slow (to us) 3G internet connection. This was actually much faster than their previous connections which allowed them to stretch their digital legs and explore a new less censored internet. In 2013 more telecommunication laws were established to protect the people's freedom so by this point they were allowed to access troves more information. By 2017 their was an estimated 25.1% of people in the country using some form of internet, much of this increase can be attributed to the use of smartphones.Internet History In Myanmar

Arguably the most popular use for the internet in Myanmar is Facebook. With 20 Million users in a population of 54 million, needless to say it's popular. This number has jumped up by leaps and bounds over the past few years but hasn't come without a few hiccups. For example, Facebook perpetuated a riot in 2014. For brevity sake i'll sum up the story, a man was accused of rape and because of someone with a large Facebook following and religious differences a riot was incited. The accusation was originally on a blog but blew up when it made it's way onto Facebook. This story shows that no matter where it is some angry misguided person will try to use the internet as their own hate-speech platform. The full story is below:
Facebook Riot Myanmar
Myanmar is obviously subject to the same growing pains numerous other countries have experienced when modernizing their digital access. None the less it has led to new economic growth due to better communication and new markets. The cellphone and internet service market is growing every day. It's just a matter of time before internet access is spread from corner to corner across the entire country. I like to be optimistic and think that with less censorship and restrictions that it will promote knowledge and growth among the population.
The Myanmar Times
Thursday, October 3, 2019
#1- News and Information,
I wouldn't call myself an avid news reader unless it's television or movie related but when I seek out information it's generally something on a global scale. BBC news is a widely consumed and widely trusted source of global news. BBC, the British Broadcasting Company, was founded on the 18th of October in 1922 by "a group of leading broadcasters including Marconi". The BBC has long since evolved from radio broadcast boasting multiple TV Stations and websites as well. The main site being BBC.com. Personally I use BBC for a variety of research and reference purposes.
This site is credited to be a fairly unbiased source of news and information. It was rated as Center (mostly unbiased) on allsides.com, a website that focuses on media bias. https://www.allsides.com/news-source/bbc-news-media-bias this link shows the breakdown on AllSides claim.
BBC news covers global hard and feature news stories. While the company was founded in London it has expanded far beyond the confines of England. In comparison to other online publications the BBC posts stories that aren't always related to their home country in comparison to many country centralized publications that also have a "world wide view". At a glance I saw stories from Arabia, Africa, the U.K., Japan, North Korea, the U.S., and Argentina. There are even tabs at the top of the website designated to "World", "US & Canada", and "UK" news. In the past I have used the BBC to get a less biased view on U.S. news stories. It was a nice way to shed Democratic and Republican leanings and gain an outside view.
Above is an example of what the BBC news homepage looks like. While this picture is slightly dated one thing to note about this homepage is the various headings consumers can use to filter their news by region or topic. This allows people like me to filter out anything remotely serious or depressing to gain unfettered access to news on Marvel movies, all joking aside these filters are helpful for research and narrowing down the information that you see.
BBC Current Global news sample- https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49968126
The link above is a good representation of a current story involving the U.S. and China. It is a good representation of the quality of writing and depth that is to be expected even on foreign matters. One thing readers will notice are multiple subheadings and subsections to further elaborate on the initial information being reported. As a sample of the sites work I would rate it a 7/10 for thoroughness, 8/10 for the layout of the article, and 6/10 for context information.
One thing I enjoyed about his site where it's video news stories. The feature stories were particularly amusing to me so I figured why not include one for some feel good vibes.
9 Year Old Indian Skateboarding sensation- https://www.bbc.com/news/video_and_audio/headlines/49963570/india-s-nine-year-old-skateboarding-sensation
All in all my final rating for the BBC as a U.K. news source is 7.5/10. It does a nice job of keeping citizens up to date on what is happening in their country from Brexit to local news. As a global news source I would rate the BBC a 8.5/10. It has a varied amount of news sources and topics from many countries. It also seems to cover them without unnecessary bias. To explain, I mean in situation where events of terrorism occur there is obvious bias against these organizations but that speaks for itself, whereas in political matter the BBC tries to stay middle ground.
This site is credited to be a fairly unbiased source of news and information. It was rated as Center (mostly unbiased) on allsides.com, a website that focuses on media bias. https://www.allsides.com/news-source/bbc-news-media-bias this link shows the breakdown on AllSides claim.
BBC news covers global hard and feature news stories. While the company was founded in London it has expanded far beyond the confines of England. In comparison to other online publications the BBC posts stories that aren't always related to their home country in comparison to many country centralized publications that also have a "world wide view". At a glance I saw stories from Arabia, Africa, the U.K., Japan, North Korea, the U.S., and Argentina. There are even tabs at the top of the website designated to "World", "US & Canada", and "UK" news. In the past I have used the BBC to get a less biased view on U.S. news stories. It was a nice way to shed Democratic and Republican leanings and gain an outside view.
Above is an example of what the BBC news homepage looks like. While this picture is slightly dated one thing to note about this homepage is the various headings consumers can use to filter their news by region or topic. This allows people like me to filter out anything remotely serious or depressing to gain unfettered access to news on Marvel movies, all joking aside these filters are helpful for research and narrowing down the information that you see.
BBC Current Global news sample- https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49968126
The link above is a good representation of a current story involving the U.S. and China. It is a good representation of the quality of writing and depth that is to be expected even on foreign matters. One thing readers will notice are multiple subheadings and subsections to further elaborate on the initial information being reported. As a sample of the sites work I would rate it a 7/10 for thoroughness, 8/10 for the layout of the article, and 6/10 for context information.
One thing I enjoyed about his site where it's video news stories. The feature stories were particularly amusing to me so I figured why not include one for some feel good vibes.
9 Year Old Indian Skateboarding sensation- https://www.bbc.com/news/video_and_audio/headlines/49963570/india-s-nine-year-old-skateboarding-sensation
All in all my final rating for the BBC as a U.K. news source is 7.5/10. It does a nice job of keeping citizens up to date on what is happening in their country from Brexit to local news. As a global news source I would rate the BBC a 8.5/10. It has a varied amount of news sources and topics from many countries. It also seems to cover them without unnecessary bias. To explain, I mean in situation where events of terrorism occur there is obvious bias against these organizations but that speaks for itself, whereas in political matter the BBC tries to stay middle ground.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












